EKSIBISIONISME Exhibitionism and Voyeurism in Live-Streaming Applications as Affection Labor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37826/spektrum.v11i1.415Kata Kunci:
Exhibitionism; Voyeurism; Streaming Applications; Affection Labor., Eksibisionisme, voyeurisme, aplikasi streaming, kebiasaanAbstrak
Meskipun berdampak baik bagi masyarakat, konektivitas dan aksesibilitas internet memiliki konsekuensi etis dan memberikan implikasi bagi hukum di Indonesia. Dampak eksibisionisme dan voyeurisme inilah yang kami rujuk dalam karya ini adalah eksibisionisme dan voyeurisme. Praktik ini dimediasi melalui sejumlah tempat komunikasi berbasis media baru. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan fenomena eksibisionisme dan voyeurisme ini dari perspektif kerangka pemikiran psikoanalitik dan menguraikan bagaimana reifikasi pengguna menjadi logika tenaga kerja, dan menjelaskan bagaimana proses psikoanalitik konsumerisme terhubung dengan ketelanjangan dalam siaran langsung. Kami mengumpulkan informasi dengan mengawasi penggunaan aplikasi Live streaming (Bigo, Gogo-live, Tik Tok), baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung melalui program YouTube. Studi ini sampai pada kesimpulan bahwa konsumerisme, atau voyeurisme, terjadi dalam program live chat streaming. Logika kapitalisme dan kapitalisasi di sektor Internet dan jaringan mendorong praktik eksibisionisme dan voyeurisme oleh pengguna aplikasi live streaming (labor). Dengan mengubah penonton atau konten menjadi komoditas, perlaku voyeur membuat berbagai komoditas. Selain itu, telanjang adalah semacam komoditas dari labor keras yang secara secara etiks memberikkan dampak seperti pornografi yang diatur dalam sistem hukum Indonesia.
Kata-kata Kunci: Eksibisionisme; Voyeurisme; Streaming Applications; Affection Labor
Referensi
Angelini, A. (2021). Otto Fenichel: Ideas between two continents. In Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.3280/PU2021-001009
Barcan, R. (2004). Nudity, A Cultural Anatomy. In Nuncius (Issue 2). Oxford New York.
Baruh, L. (2010). Mediated voyeurism and the guilty pleasure of consuming reality television. Media Psychology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.502871
Bonovitz, C. (2006). The illusion of certainty in self-disclosure: Commentary on paper by Helen K. Gediman. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Brian, L. O., & Robert, L. M. (2014). Critical media studies: An Introduction (1st ed.).
Cardin, P. T., & Teixeira, M. A. (2017). Fenichel theory for multiple time scale singular perturbation problems. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1067202
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition. (2020). In Definitions. https://doi.org/10.32388/6ypoe8
Dodds, J. (2019). Otto Fenichel and Ecopsychoanalysis in the Anthropocene. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1551806X.2019.1601921
Fenichel, O. (2005). The Psycho Analytic Theory of Neurosis. Routledge.
Frank, A. W. (1995). The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society (see IRPS No. 80/95c02174). In Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie (Vol. 20, Issue 4).
Frank, A. W., & Synnott, A. (1995). The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3341866
Gediman, H. K. (1985). Imposture, inauthenticity, and feeling fraudulent. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518503300408
Gossop, M. (1981). Psycho-analytic Theories of Neurosis. In Theories of Neurosis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88473-3_7
Hartman, S. (2006). Disclosure, dis-closure, diss/clothes/sure: Commentary on paper by Helen K. Gediman. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Huhtamo, E. (2012). Toward a History of Peep Practice. In A Companion to Early Cinema. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118274453.ch2
Marx, Karl. (1973). Grundrisse-Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (M. Nicolaus, Ed.). Penguin Books.
Marx, Karl. (2010). Capital-A critique of political economy. pacps.
Metzl, J. M. (2004a). From scopophilia to Survivor: A brief history of voyeurism. Textual Practice, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/09502360410001732935
Metzl, J. M. (2004b). Voyeur Nation? Changing Definitions of Voyeurism, 1950-2004. In Harvard Review of Psychiatry (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220490447245
Mosko, M. (2015). Margaret Grebowicz, Why Internet Porn Matters. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-8047-8662-1. Hypatia Reviews Online, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2753906700001522
Nurbaiti, A., & Anshari, I. N. (2020). Privacy Management in Social Network Sites: A Case Study on the Use of Finstagram for Mediated Voyeurism. Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi Indonesia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmki.55012
Pérez Serrano Flores, V. (2015). The body and the screen: theories of Internet spectatorship. Comunicación y Sociedad, 14. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v0i14.1289
Slochower, J. (2006). The psychoanalytic other: Commentary on paper by Helen K. Gediman. In Psychoanalytic Dialogues (Vol. 16, Issue 3).
Twersky, R. (2020). Review of Stalker, Hacker, Voyeur, Spy: A Psychoanalytic Study of Erotomania, Voyeurism, Surveillance, and Invasions of Privacy by Helen K. Gediman. London, UK: Routledge. 2018. 244 pp. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2019.1643621
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). The Network Society : Social Aspects of New Media (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Wang, S. S. (2015). To unfriend or not: exploring factors affecting users in keeping friends on Facebook and the implications on mediated voyeurism. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.990469
White, M. (2019). The Body and the Screen. In The Body and the Screen. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1639.001.0001
Yousman, B. (2005). Review of Gender, Race, and Class in Media: A Text-Reader (2nd ed.). Journal of Communication, 55(2).
